Latest rate
3.8% Q2 2026
Charge-Off Rate on Credit Card Loans
Down from 4.2% a year earlier.
Where the Charge-Off Rate on Credit Card Loans stands now
The Charge-Off Rate on Credit Card Loans was 3.8% in the second quarter of 2026. Since 2010 it has ranged from 1.6% in the fourth quarter of 2021 to 10.5% in the first quarter of 2010.
What it means for households: Credit Card Default Statistics Behind on payments? Your Rights with Debt Collectors
How the Charge-Off Rate on Credit Card Loans has moved since 1985
Charge-Off Rate on Credit Card Loans: down since 2024
Charge-off rate on credit card loans, percentage: 3.8% in the second quarter of 2026, down from 4.2% a year earlier. Quarterly, 1985–2026.
What the Charge-Off Rate on Credit Card Loans measures
A higher rate is worse for households.
In our research, changes in this measure have tended to show up in New Serious Delinquency Rate, Borrowers Age 70 and Over about one quarter later. How we tested this
How the Charge-Off Rate on Credit Card Loans feeds the American Distress Index
The American Distress Index (ADI) is our quarterly 0–100 score of how much financial strain U.S. households are under. Defaults and court filings are one of its five equal parts, and the Charge-Off Rate on Credit Card Loans is one of the two default and court measures inside that part.
In the second quarter of 2026, the Charge-Off Rate on Credit Card Loans was higher than in 66% of the quarters since 1985, so it pushed the score up. The index stood at 47.0, which we call Typical.
Charge-Off Rate on Credit Card Loans by quarter, 1985 to 2026
Every quarter since 1985, newest first. The change compares each quarter with the same quarter a year earlier.
The source changed how it measures this in Q1 2001. Readings before the March 2001 Call Report are partly estimated by the Federal Reserve rather than reported in full detail. Smaller banks filed the FFIEC 033 and 034 forms and could report charged-off and delinquent loans under their own loan classifications instead of the regulatory ones, so the Federal Reserve adjusted and allocated those amounts to the published loan categories using estimated ratios that differed by loan category. The Board states that from the March 2001 Call Report the detail reported by all banks eliminated the need for those procedures. In February 2017 it updated the models used to estimate data not reported by small banks that filed the FFIEC 034 form and revised the pre-2001 rates for several series, so values on that side of the boundary have already moved once without any new bank report. Figures on either side are not directly comparable, so the change column stays blank where a comparison would cross that date. Source documentation.
The source changed how it measures this in Q1 2010. From the first quarter of 2010, credit card rates cover loans that banks had securitized and previously kept off their balance sheets. Accounting standards FAS 166 and 167 required banks to bring those loans back on, and the Board states the change is reflected in the 2010-Q1 Call Reports; one large credit card bank made the move in the fourth quarter of 2009. The Board's H.8 notes put the credit card and other revolving loans consolidated by domestically chartered commercial banks at about $335 billion as of March 31, 2010. Rates from 2010 on are measured over a different pool of loans than earlier readings. Figures on either side are not directly comparable, so the change column stays blank where a comparison would cross that date. Source documentation.
| Quarter | Rate (%) | Change from a year earlier (percentage points) |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 2026 | 3.8 | −0.4 |
| Q1 2026 | 3.8 | −0.6 |
| Q4 2025 | 4.1 | −0.5 |
| Q3 2025 | 4.2 | −0.5 |
| Q2 2025 | 4.2 | −0.4 |
| Q1 2025 | 4.4 | 0.0 |
| Q4 2024 | 4.6 | +0.4 |
| Q3 2024 | 4.7 | +0.9 |
| Q2 2024 | 4.6 | +1.4 |
| Q1 2024 | 4.4 | +1.5 |
| Q4 2023 | 4.2 | +1.7 |
| Q3 2023 | 3.8 | +1.7 |
| Q2 2023 | 3.2 | +1.3 |
| Q1 2023 | 2.9 | +1.2 |
| Q4 2022 | 2.5 | +0.9 |
| Q3 2022 | 2.1 | +0.3 |
| Q2 2022 | 1.9 | −0.5 |
| Q1 2022 | 1.7 | −1.1 |
| Q4 2021 | 1.6 | −1.1 |
| Q3 2021 | 1.8 | −1.8 |
| Q2 2021 | 2.4 | −1.4 |
| Q1 2021 | 2.8 | −0.9 |
| Q4 2020 | 2.7 | −1.1 |
| Q3 2020 | 3.6 | −0.2 |
| Q2 2020 | 3.8 | +0.2 |
| Q1 2020 | 3.7 | 0.0 |
| Q4 2019 | 3.8 | +0.1 |
| Q3 2019 | 3.8 | +0.1 |
| Q2 2019 | 3.6 | 0.0 |
| Q1 2019 | 3.7 | 0.0 |
| Q4 2018 | 3.7 | 0.0 |
| Q3 2018 | 3.7 | +0.1 |
| Q2 2018 | 3.6 | +0.1 |
| Q1 2018 | 3.7 | +0.2 |
| Q4 2017 | 3.7 | +0.2 |
| Q3 2017 | 3.6 | +0.5 |
| Q2 2017 | 3.5 | +0.5 |
| Q1 2017 | 3.5 | +0.5 |
| Q4 2016 | 3.5 | +0.6 |
| Q3 2016 | 3.1 | +0.1 |
| Q2 2016 | 3.0 | +0.1 |
| Q1 2016 | 3.0 | +0.1 |
| Q4 2015 | 2.9 | −0.1 |
| Q3 2015 | 3.0 | −0.1 |
| Q2 2015 | 2.9 | −0.4 |
| Q1 2015 | 2.9 | −0.3 |
| Q4 2014 | 3.0 | −0.4 |
| Q3 2014 | 3.1 | −0.3 |
| Q2 2014 | 3.3 | −0.2 |
| Q1 2014 | 3.2 | −0.5 |
| Q4 2013 | 3.4 | −0.4 |
| Q3 2013 | 3.4 | −0.5 |
| Q2 2013 | 3.5 | −0.5 |
| Q1 2013 | 3.7 | −0.5 |
| Q4 2012 | 3.8 | −0.8 |
| Q3 2012 | 3.9 | −2.0 |
| Q2 2012 | 4.0 | −1.3 |
| Q1 2012 | 4.2 | −2.7 |
| Q4 2011 | 4.6 | −3.3 |
| Q3 2011 | 5.9 | −2.9 |
| Q2 2011 | 5.3 | −5.1 |
| Q1 2011 | 6.9 | −3.6 |
| Q4 2010 | 7.9 | — |
| Q3 2010 | 8.8 | — |
| Q2 2010 | 10.4 | — |
| Q1 2010 | 10.5 | — |
| Q4 2009 | 10.5 | +4.0 |
| Q3 2009 | 10.2 | +4.4 |
| Q2 2009 | 9.3 | +4.0 |
| Q1 2009 | 7.7 | +2.9 |
| Q4 2008 | 6.5 | +2.2 |
| Q3 2008 | 5.8 | +1.9 |
| Q2 2008 | 5.3 | +1.6 |
| Q1 2008 | 4.8 | +0.8 |
| Q4 2007 | 4.3 | +0.6 |
| Q3 2007 | 3.9 | +0.1 |
| Q2 2007 | 3.7 | +0.3 |
| Q1 2007 | 4.0 | +0.8 |
| Q4 2006 | 3.7 | −2.4 |
| Q3 2006 | 3.8 | −0.6 |
| Q2 2006 | 3.4 | −0.9 |
| Q1 2006 | 3.2 | −1.5 |
| Q4 2005 | 6.1 | +1.4 |
| Q3 2005 | 4.4 | −0.1 |
| Q2 2005 | 4.3 | −1.0 |
| Q1 2005 | 4.7 | −0.7 |
| Q4 2004 | 4.7 | −1.3 |
| Q3 2004 | 4.5 | −1.1 |
| Q2 2004 | 5.3 | −0.7 |
| Q1 2004 | 5.4 | −0.3 |
| Q4 2003 | 6.0 | +0.5 |
| Q3 2003 | 5.6 | −0.6 |
| Q2 2003 | 6.0 | −0.2 |
| Q1 2003 | 5.7 | −2.0 |
| Q4 2002 | 5.5 | −0.9 |
| Q3 2002 | 6.2 | +0.6 |
| Q2 2002 | 6.2 | +1.0 |
| Q1 2002 | 7.7 | +3.1 |
| Q4 2001 | 6.4 | — |
| Q3 2001 | 5.6 | — |
| Q2 2001 | 5.2 | — |
| Q1 2001 | 4.6 | — |
| Q4 2000 | 4.4 | −0.1 |
| Q3 2000 | 4.3 | −0.2 |
| Q2 2000 | 4.1 | −0.2 |
| Q1 2000 | 4.5 | −0.4 |
| Q4 1999 | 4.5 | −0.6 |
| Q3 1999 | 4.5 | −0.8 |
| Q2 1999 | 4.3 | −0.9 |
| Q1 1999 | 4.9 | −0.3 |
| Q4 1998 | 5.1 | −0.3 |
| Q3 1998 | 5.3 | −0.2 |
| Q2 1998 | 5.2 | −0.2 |
| Q1 1998 | 5.2 | +0.3 |
| Q4 1997 | 5.4 | +0.7 |
| Q3 1997 | 5.5 | +1.0 |
| Q2 1997 | 5.4 | +0.9 |
| Q1 1997 | 4.9 | +0.7 |
| Q4 1996 | 4.7 | +0.8 |
| Q3 1996 | 4.5 | +0.8 |
| Q2 1996 | 4.5 | +1.2 |
| Q1 1996 | 4.2 | +1.3 |
| Q4 1995 | 3.9 | +0.8 |
| Q3 1995 | 3.7 | +0.7 |
| Q2 1995 | 3.3 | +0.3 |
| Q1 1995 | 2.9 | −0.4 |
| Q4 1994 | 3.1 | −0.2 |
| Q3 1994 | 3.0 | −0.7 |
| Q2 1994 | 3.0 | −1.0 |
| Q1 1994 | 3.3 | −0.8 |
| Q4 1993 | 3.3 | −1.2 |
| Q3 1993 | 3.7 | −0.6 |
| Q2 1993 | 4.0 | −0.8 |
| Q1 1993 | 4.1 | −0.8 |
| Q4 1992 | 4.5 | −0.1 |
| Q3 1992 | 4.3 | −0.5 |
| Q2 1992 | 4.8 | +0.2 |
| Q1 1992 | 4.9 | +0.7 |
| Q4 1991 | 4.6 | +0.8 |
| Q3 1991 | 4.8 | +1.2 |
| Q2 1991 | 4.6 | +1.4 |
| Q1 1991 | 4.2 | +1.1 |
| Q4 1990 | 3.8 | +0.6 |
| Q3 1990 | 3.6 | +0.5 |
| Q2 1990 | 3.2 | 0.0 |
| Q1 1990 | 3.1 | 0.0 |
| Q4 1989 | 3.2 | +0.1 |
| Q3 1989 | 3.1 | −0.1 |
| Q2 1989 | 3.2 | 0.0 |
| Q1 1989 | 3.1 | −0.1 |
| Q4 1988 | 3.1 | −0.1 |
| Q3 1988 | 3.2 | 0.0 |
| Q2 1988 | 3.2 | −0.1 |
| Q1 1988 | 3.2 | −0.3 |
| Q4 1987 | 3.2 | −0.2 |
| Q3 1987 | 3.2 | −0.2 |
| Q2 1987 | 3.3 | +0.1 |
| Q1 1987 | 3.5 | +0.4 |
| Q4 1986 | 3.4 | +0.5 |
| Q3 1986 | 3.4 | +0.7 |
| Q2 1986 | 3.2 | +0.9 |
| Q1 1986 | 3.1 | +1.2 |
| Q4 1985 | 2.9 | — |
| Q3 1985 | 2.7 | — |
| Q2 1985 | 2.3 | — |
| Q1 1985 | 1.9 | — |
Quarterly · Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System data retrieved via FRED (CORCCACBS)
Counties with the highest delinquency scores
There's no county figure for this measure, so this list uses the delinquency part of our County Distress Index.
| Rank | County | Score (0–100) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leflore County, MS | 99.8 |
| 2 | Clayton County, GA | 99.7 |
| 3 | Williamsburg County, SC | 99.7 |
| 4 | Leake County, MS | 99.5 |
| 5 | Coahoma County, MS | 99.5 |
| 6 | Dillon County, SC | 99.4 |
| 7 | Marlboro County, SC | 99.4 |
| 8 | Washington County, MS | 99.3 |
| 9 | Tippah County, MS | 99.3 |
| 10 | Jefferson County, AR | 99.2 |
Questions about the Charge-Off Rate on Credit Card Loans
What is the current credit card charge-off rate?
The annualized net charge-off rate on credit card loans at U.S. commercial banks was 3.8% in the second quarter of 2026, down from 4.2% a year earlier, according to the Federal Reserve Board's Call Report data. It is the card balances banks wrote off during the quarter, net of recoveries, as an annualized share of average card balances. Source: Federal Reserve Board data retrieved via FRED (CORCCACBS).
What is a credit card charge-off?
A charge-off is a card balance a bank removes from its books as a loss. Under bank regulators' policy that generally happens once a card is 180 days past due, sooner after a bankruptcy notice or fraud. The borrower can still owe the debt. The Federal Reserve Board's rate is net of recoveries and annualized.
How does the charge-off rate relate to delinquency?
They are separate aggregate measures on the same Federal Reserve release. Delinquency is the share of card balances 30 or more days past due at quarter end. The charge-off rate is balances written off during the quarter, net of recoveries, as an annualized share of average balances. Their levels can be read side by side, but the data do not trace individual accounts from one to the other.
Where does charge-off data come from?
The Federal Reserve Board compiles it from the Call Reports that commercial banks file and publishes it about two months after each quarter ends. FRED republishes it as CORCCACBS. It is one of the inputs to the American Distress Index's Default & Legal domain.
Sources and method for the Charge-Off Rate on Credit Card Loans
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System data retrieved via FRED (CORCCACBS) We use the quarterly figures as published, from the first quarter of 1985 through the second quarter of 2026, with no adjustment of our own. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System’s report
- American Default Research · American Distress Index American Default Research uses this rate in the American Distress Index.
We write with assistance from AI tools. Figures come from the data and sources named on this page.