Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans
Credit card loan delinquency rate
Where the Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans stands now
The Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans was 2.9% in the second quarter of 2026. Since 2010 it has ranged from 1.5% in the third quarter of 2021 to 5.8% in the first quarter of 2010.
What it means for households: Credit Card Default Statistics Behind on payments? Your Rights with Debt Collectors
How the Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans has moved since 1991
Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans: down since 2024
Credit card loan delinquency rate, percentage of balances: 2.9% in the second quarter of 2026, down from 3.0% a year earlier. Quarterly, 1991–2026.
What the Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans measures
Measurement basis: 30+ days past due or in nonaccrual status, per the Federal Reserve Board Charge-Off and Delinquency Rates release
A higher rate is worse for households.
In our research, changes in this measure have tended to show up in Charge-Off Rate on All Loans about 3 quarters later. How we tested this
How the Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans feeds the American Distress Index
The American Distress Index (ADI) is our quarterly 0–100 score of how much financial strain U.S. households are under. Late payments are one of its five equal parts, and the Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans is one of the four late-payment measures inside that part.
In the second quarter of 2026, the Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans was higher than in 67% of the quarters since 1991, so it pushed the score up. The index stood at 47.0, which we call Typical.
Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans by quarter, 1991 to 2026
Every quarter since 1991, newest first. The change compares each quarter with the same quarter a year earlier.
The source changed how it measures this in Q1 2001. Readings before the March 2001 Call Report are partly estimated by the Federal Reserve rather than reported in full detail. Smaller banks filed the FFIEC 033 and 034 forms and could report charged-off and delinquent loans under their own loan classifications instead of the regulatory ones, so the Federal Reserve adjusted and allocated those amounts to the published loan categories using estimated ratios that differed by loan category. The Board states that from the March 2001 Call Report the detail reported by all banks eliminated the need for those procedures. In February 2017 it updated the models used to estimate data not reported by small banks that filed the FFIEC 034 form and revised the pre-2001 rates for several series, so values on that side of the boundary have already moved once without any new bank report. Figures on either side are not directly comparable, so the change column stays blank where a comparison would cross that date. Source documentation.
The source changed how it measures this in Q1 2010. From the first quarter of 2010, credit card rates cover loans that banks had securitized and previously kept off their balance sheets. Accounting standards FAS 166 and 167 required banks to bring those loans back on, and the Board states the change is reflected in the 2010-Q1 Call Reports; one large credit card bank made the move in the fourth quarter of 2009. The Board's H.8 notes put the credit card and other revolving loans consolidated by domestically chartered commercial banks at about $335 billion as of March 31, 2010. Rates from 2010 on are measured over a different pool of loans than earlier readings. Figures on either side are not directly comparable, so the change column stays blank where a comparison would cross that date. Source documentation.
| Quarter | Rate (%) | Change from a year earlier (percentage points) |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 2026 | 2.9 | −0.1 |
| Q1 2026 | 2.9 | −0.2 |
| Q4 2025 | 3.0 | −0.1 |
| Q3 2025 | 3.0 | −0.2 |
| Q2 2025 | 3.0 | −0.2 |
| Q1 2025 | 3.1 | −0.1 |
| Q4 2024 | 3.1 | 0.0 |
| Q3 2024 | 3.2 | +0.2 |
| Q2 2024 | 3.2 | +0.4 |
| Q1 2024 | 3.2 | +0.7 |
| Q4 2023 | 3.1 | +0.8 |
| Q3 2023 | 3.0 | +0.9 |
| Q2 2023 | 2.8 | +1.0 |
| Q1 2023 | 2.5 | +0.8 |
| Q4 2022 | 2.3 | +0.7 |
| Q3 2022 | 2.1 | +0.6 |
| Q2 2022 | 1.8 | +0.2 |
| Q1 2022 | 1.7 | −0.2 |
| Q4 2021 | 1.6 | −0.5 |
| Q3 2021 | 1.5 | −0.5 |
| Q2 2021 | 1.6 | −0.9 |
| Q1 2021 | 1.9 | −0.8 |
| Q4 2020 | 2.1 | −0.5 |
| Q3 2020 | 2.0 | −0.6 |
| Q2 2020 | 2.5 | −0.1 |
| Q1 2020 | 2.7 | +0.2 |
| Q4 2019 | 2.6 | +0.1 |
| Q3 2019 | 2.6 | +0.1 |
| Q2 2019 | 2.6 | +0.1 |
| Q1 2019 | 2.5 | 0.0 |
| Q4 2018 | 2.5 | 0.0 |
| Q3 2018 | 2.5 | 0.0 |
| Q2 2018 | 2.5 | 0.0 |
| Q1 2018 | 2.5 | +0.1 |
| Q4 2017 | 2.5 | +0.1 |
| Q3 2017 | 2.5 | +0.2 |
| Q2 2017 | 2.5 | +0.3 |
| Q1 2017 | 2.4 | +0.2 |
| Q4 2016 | 2.4 | +0.2 |
| Q3 2016 | 2.3 | +0.1 |
| Q2 2016 | 2.2 | +0.1 |
| Q1 2016 | 2.2 | +0.1 |
| Q4 2015 | 2.2 | 0.0 |
| Q3 2015 | 2.2 | 0.0 |
| Q2 2015 | 2.1 | −0.2 |
| Q1 2015 | 2.1 | −0.2 |
| Q4 2014 | 2.2 | −0.2 |
| Q3 2014 | 2.2 | −0.2 |
| Q2 2014 | 2.3 | −0.2 |
| Q1 2014 | 2.3 | −0.3 |
| Q4 2013 | 2.4 | −0.3 |
| Q3 2013 | 2.4 | −0.4 |
| Q2 2013 | 2.5 | −0.4 |
| Q1 2013 | 2.6 | −0.5 |
| Q4 2012 | 2.7 | −0.6 |
| Q3 2012 | 2.8 | −0.7 |
| Q2 2012 | 2.9 | −0.8 |
| Q1 2012 | 3.1 | −0.7 |
| Q4 2011 | 3.3 | −0.8 |
| Q3 2011 | 3.5 | −1.1 |
| Q2 2011 | 3.7 | −1.4 |
| Q1 2011 | 3.8 | −2.0 |
| Q4 2010 | 4.1 | — |
| Q3 2010 | 4.6 | — |
| Q2 2010 | 5.1 | — |
| Q1 2010 | 5.8 | — |
| Q4 2009 | 6.3 | +0.7 |
| Q3 2009 | 6.5 | +1.7 |
| Q2 2009 | 6.8 | +1.9 |
| Q1 2009 | 6.5 | +1.7 |
| Q4 2008 | 5.6 | +1.0 |
| Q3 2008 | 4.8 | +0.4 |
| Q2 2008 | 4.9 | +0.9 |
| Q1 2008 | 4.8 | +0.8 |
| Q4 2007 | 4.6 | +0.6 |
| Q3 2007 | 4.4 | +0.3 |
| Q2 2007 | 4.0 | −0.1 |
| Q1 2007 | 4.0 | +0.1 |
| Q4 2006 | 4.0 | +0.5 |
| Q3 2006 | 4.1 | +0.2 |
| Q2 2006 | 4.1 | +0.4 |
| Q1 2006 | 3.9 | +0.2 |
| Q4 2005 | 3.5 | −0.5 |
| Q3 2005 | 3.9 | −0.2 |
| Q2 2005 | 3.7 | −0.5 |
| Q1 2005 | 3.7 | −0.5 |
| Q4 2004 | 4.0 | −0.4 |
| Q3 2004 | 4.1 | −0.1 |
| Q2 2004 | 4.2 | −0.3 |
| Q1 2004 | 4.2 | −0.5 |
| Q4 2003 | 4.4 | −0.4 |
| Q3 2003 | 4.2 | −0.7 |
| Q2 2003 | 4.5 | −0.3 |
| Q1 2003 | 4.7 | −0.2 |
| Q4 2002 | 4.8 | +0.1 |
| Q3 2002 | 4.9 | −0.1 |
| Q2 2002 | 4.8 | −0.1 |
| Q1 2002 | 4.9 | +0.1 |
| Q4 2001 | 4.7 | — |
| Q3 2001 | 5.0 | — |
| Q2 2001 | 4.9 | — |
| Q1 2001 | 4.8 | — |
| Q4 2000 | 4.6 | 0.0 |
| Q3 2000 | 4.5 | −0.1 |
| Q2 2000 | 4.5 | −0.1 |
| Q1 2000 | 4.4 | −0.3 |
| Q4 1999 | 4.6 | −0.1 |
| Q3 1999 | 4.6 | −0.1 |
| Q2 1999 | 4.6 | −0.2 |
| Q1 1999 | 4.7 | −0.1 |
| Q4 1998 | 4.7 | −0.1 |
| Q3 1998 | 4.7 | 0.0 |
| Q2 1998 | 4.8 | +0.1 |
| Q1 1998 | 4.8 | +0.1 |
| Q4 1997 | 4.8 | +0.2 |
| Q3 1997 | 4.7 | +0.2 |
| Q2 1997 | 4.7 | +0.4 |
| Q1 1997 | 4.7 | +0.7 |
| Q4 1996 | 4.6 | +0.6 |
| Q3 1996 | 4.5 | +0.6 |
| Q2 1996 | 4.3 | +0.6 |
| Q1 1996 | 4.0 | +0.5 |
| Q4 1995 | 4.0 | +0.7 |
| Q3 1995 | 3.9 | +0.6 |
| Q2 1995 | 3.7 | +0.4 |
| Q1 1995 | 3.5 | −0.1 |
| Q4 1994 | 3.3 | −0.6 |
| Q3 1994 | 3.3 | −0.8 |
| Q2 1994 | 3.3 | −1.2 |
| Q1 1994 | 3.6 | −1.0 |
| Q4 1993 | 3.9 | −0.8 |
| Q3 1993 | 4.1 | −0.9 |
| Q2 1993 | 4.5 | −0.6 |
| Q1 1993 | 4.6 | −0.7 |
| Q4 1992 | 4.7 | −0.6 |
| Q3 1992 | 5.0 | −0.4 |
| Q2 1992 | 5.1 | −0.4 |
| Q1 1992 | 5.3 | 0.0 |
| Q4 1991 | 5.3 | — |
| Q3 1991 | 5.4 | — |
| Q2 1991 | 5.5 | — |
| Q1 1991 | 5.3 | — |
Quarterly · Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System data retrieved via FRED (DRCCLACBS)
Counties with the highest delinquency scores
There's no county figure for this measure, so this list uses the delinquency part of our County Distress Index.
| Rank | County | Score (0–100) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leflore County, MS | 99.8 |
| 2 | Clayton County, GA | 99.7 |
| 3 | Williamsburg County, SC | 99.7 |
| 4 | Leake County, MS | 99.5 |
| 5 | Coahoma County, MS | 99.5 |
| 6 | Dillon County, SC | 99.4 |
| 7 | Marlboro County, SC | 99.4 |
| 8 | Washington County, MS | 99.3 |
| 9 | Tippah County, MS | 99.3 |
| 10 | Jefferson County, AR | 99.2 |
Questions about the Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans
What is the current credit card delinquency rate?
The credit card delinquency rate at U.S. commercial banks was 2.9% in the second quarter of 2026, down from 3% a year earlier, according to the Federal Reserve Board. It is the share of card balances on banks' books that are 30 or more days past due or in nonaccrual status. Source: Federal Reserve Board data retrieved via FRED (DRCCLACBS).
What does credit card delinquency measure?
It is the share of credit card balances at insured U.S.-chartered commercial banks that are 30 or more days past due or in nonaccrual status. The Federal Reserve Board publishes it quarterly as the delinquency rate on credit card loans, all commercial banks (FRED series DRCCLACBS). It counts dollars of balances, not cardholders or accounts.
How does credit card delinquency connect to the American Distress Index?
Credit card delinquency is one of four inputs to the American Distress Index's Delinquency domain, alongside mortgage, consumer loan and auto loan delinquency. Each input is scored against its own quarterly history.
Where does credit card delinquency data come from?
The Federal Reserve Board compiles it from the Call Reports that commercial banks file and publishes it about two months after each quarter ends, in its Charge-Off and Delinquency Rates on Loans and Leases at Commercial Banks release. FRED republishes it as DRCCLACBS.
Sources and method for the Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System data retrieved via FRED (DRCCLACBS) Measurement basis: 30+ days past due or in nonaccrual status, per the Federal Reserve Board Charge-Off and Delinquency Rates release We use the quarterly figures as published, from the first quarter of 1991 through the second quarter of 2026, with no adjustment of our own. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System’s report
- American Default Research · American Distress Index American Default Research uses this rate in the American Distress Index.
We write with assistance from AI tools. Figures come from the data and sources named on this page.