#2,514 Montana · 2026

Lewis and Clark County, Montana

Healthy 2,514th of 3,144 counties nationally · 75,011 residents How this is calculated →
The headline number
29% Lewis and Clark residents
vs.
24% U.S. median

Above the national median for owner housing burden.

Census ACS 5-yr (2023)

Main Findings

Wire lede · 30 words · paste-ready

Lewis and Clark County, Montana ranks 2,514th most distressed in the United States on the County Distress Index. Lewis and Clark sits near the national median across major distress indicators.

Key Findings
  • 2,514th of 3,144 counties on the County Distress Index — Healthy zone, 30th in Montana.
  • 29% of owner households pay 30%+ of income on housing (U.S. median 24%). Owner housing burden at the 85th percentile nationally.
  • Wage-to-rent ratio at 3.1× — national median 4.0×, ranked at the 85th percentile.
  • Legal Distress domain score 29 — weight 7.4% of the CDI composite.
  • Consumer Credit Distress domain score 23 — weight 47.5% of the CDI composite.
Distinctive Signals
Stalled Formation

75,011 residents, with a business application rate at the 1st percentile. Per-capita business formation has slowed sharply.

County Distress Index cluster map. Lewis and Clark County, Montana and its neighbors colored by distress zone.
Lewis and Clark and its 7 geographic neighbors, graded by County Distress Index score. Lewis and Clark County ranks 2,514th of 3,144. American Default Research
Wire quote — paste-ready, any angle 33 words

"Lewis and Clark County is one of the steadier counties on the index — durable fundamentals across most domains. The risk pattern here is asymmetric: a single shock can change the picture quickly."

— Ross Kilburn, Founder, American Default Research
Analyst quote — for voice-y features 29 words

"Healthy-zone counties have durable fundamentals across most distress domains. The risk pattern here is asymmetric: a single shock — health, housing, or income — can change the picture quickly."

— Ross Kilburn, Founder, American Default Research

Reporter's Notes

Two data points in the indicator table worth a follow-up call.

Data anomaly
Business formation rate sits well below the rest of the Economic Vitality domain — the one indicator that doesn't fit

Lewis and Clark County's business formation rate indicator is at the 1st percentile — while every other indicator in the Economic Vitality domain sits at or above the 32nd percentile. The gap stands out against the other credit indicators. Worth a call to Urban Institute or a local credit counselor in Helena.

The Indicators Behind Lewis and Clark County's CDI Score

Every number traces to a public source. Lewis and Clark County's value shown alongside MT's median and the U.S. median. Full CSV available for download.

How to read the table. A domain score is a 0–100 composite of the indicators in that domain, where 50 = U.S. county median and higher = more distressed. Percentile is Lewis and Clark County's national rank among all 3,144 U.S. counties for that indicator, always oriented so higher = more distressed.
Indicator Lewis and Clark MT median U.S. median Pctile Source
Consumer Credit Distress — domain score 23 · Rank 2,553 of 3,144
Debt in collections Share of residents with a credit file who have debt in collections 14% 15% 23% 16th Urban Institute (2024)
Medical debt in collections Share of residents with a credit file who have medical debt in collections 3% 3% 4% 41st Urban Institute (2024)
Auto loan delinquency Share of auto loan accounts 60+ days past due 4% 3% 5% 36th Urban Institute (2024)
Credit card delinquency Share of credit card accounts 60+ days past due 3% 3% 5% 7th Urban Institute (2024)
Uninsured rate Share of residents without health insurance coverage 6% 8% 8% 31st Census ACS 5-yr (2023)
Subprime credit share Share of residents with a credit score below 660 16% 16% 23% 18th Urban Institute (2024)
Housing Cost Burden — domain score 56 · Rank 1,322 of 3,144
Rent burden (30%+) Share of renter households paying 30%+ of income on rent 40% 29% 38% 59th Census ACS 5-yr (2023)
Severe rent burden (50%+) Share of renter households paying 50%+ of income on rent 16% 14% 18% 36th Census ACS 5-yr (2023)
Owner housing burden Share of owner households paying 30%+ of income on housing 29% 23% 24% 85th Census ACS 5-yr (2023)
Homeownership rate Share of occupied housing units that are owner-occupied 70% 73% 74% 72nd Census ACS 5-yr (2023)
Structural Poverty — domain score 19 · Rank 2,772 of 3,144
Unemployment Share of labor force unemployed 4% 4% 4% 32nd BLS LAUS (Dec 2025)
Poverty rate Share of population below the federal poverty line 9% 13% 14% 15th Census SAIPE (2023)
Household income relative to state Median household income as share of state median 1.29× 1.00× 1.00× 11th Census SAIPE (2023)
Child poverty rate Share of children under 18 below the federal poverty line 10% 17% 18% 9th Census SAIPE (2023)
Disability rate Share of residents reporting a disability 14% 16% 16% 37th Census ACS 5-yr (2023)
Transfer-income dependency Share of personal income from government transfers 19% 25% 27% 18th BEA Regional Personal Income (2023)
Legal Distress — domain score 29 · Rank 2,226 of 3,144
Bankruptcy filing rate Personal bankruptcy filings per 100,000 residents 87 73 126 29th US Courts F-5A (2025)
Economic Vitality — domain score 65 · Rank 742 of 3,144
Wage-to-rent ratio Ratio of average weekly wage to fair-market rent 3.1× 3.2× 4.0× 85th BLS QCEW × HUD FMR (2024)
Rent-to-income ratio Fair Market Rent (2BR) as share of median household income 26% 26% 21% 83rd HUD FMR × Census ACS (2024)
Business formation rate New business applications per 1,000 residents 29.2 14.0 10.0 1st Census Business Formation Statistics (2024)
House price change (yoy) House price index year-over-year change 5% 2% 4% 32nd FHFA HPI (2024)
Data compiled April 2026 from Urban Institute Debt in America (Equifax 2024 panel), U.S. Census Bureau (ACS 5-yr 2023, SAIPE 2023, Business Formation Statistics 2024), Bureau of Labor Statistics (LAUS Dec 2025, QCEW 2024), U.S. Courts Administrative Office (F-5A bankruptcy filings 2025), and HUD Fair Market Rents (FY2024).

Five-Domain Breakdown

The CDI is a PCA-weighted composite of five statistically derived factors. Weights are proportional to each factor's share of explained variance across 3,144 counties.

Economic Vitality 65
Weight 9.2% · Rank 742 of 3,144 · Pctile 76
Housing Cost Burden Primary driver 56
Weight 22.2% · Rank 1,322 of 3,144 · Pctile 58
Legal Distress 29
Weight 7.4% · Rank 2,226 of 3,144 · Pctile 29
Consumer Credit Distress 23
Weight 47.5% · Rank 2,553 of 3,144 · Pctile 19
Structural Poverty 19
Weight 13.6% · Rank 2,772 of 3,144 · Pctile 12

Methodology

The County Distress Index is a 0–100 composite score of household financial distress, computed for all 3,144 U.S. counties. A score of 50 represents the national county median; higher scores indicate greater distress. The index is built from 21 indicators grouped into five statistically derived factors via principal component analysis (PCA); factor weights are proportional to each factor's share of explained variance (shown in the Five-Domain Breakdown above).

Data sources include the Urban Institute Debt in America (Equifax consumer credit panel), U.S. Census Bureau (American Community Survey 5-year, Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, Business Formation Statistics), Bureau of Labor Statistics (Local Area Unemployment Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages), U.S. Courts Administrative Office (F-5A bankruptcy filings), and HUD Fair Market Rents. Data vintages range from 2023 to 2025 depending on source; full indicator-level vintage detail is in the methodology document.

For Press & Research

Everything you need to cite Lewis and Clark County data — in under 60 seconds.

Embed preview — paste into any CMS <iframe src="https://americandefault.org/embed/county/30049/" width="600" height="300" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:8px;" title="Lewis and Clark County, MT — County Distress Index"></iframe>
Press contact: Ross Kilburn · press@americandefault.org · (307) 264-2992 · same-day response, 9am–6pm ET
Draft wire copy 159-word AP-style article — use freely with attribution
DRAFT · 159 words · for immediate release · cleared for reuse with attribution to American Default Research

HELENA, Mont. — Lewis and Clark County ranks 2,514th among the nation's most financially distressed counties, according to the County Distress Index released this month by American Default Research.

The composite score of 34 out of 100 places Lewis and Clark in the "Healthy" zone. Among 3,144 U.S. counties scored, 2,513 counties rank more distressed. Within Montana, Lewis and Clark ranks 30th of 56 counties.

The index, which draws on 21 indicators from the U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Urban Institute and federal court filings, finds Lewis and Clark sitting near the national median across major distress indicators, with no single domain emerging as a clear driver.

"Lewis and Clark County is one of the steadier counties on the index — durable fundamentals across most domains. The risk pattern here is asymmetric: a single shock can change the picture quickly," said Ross Kilburn, founder of American Default Research.

Full methodology and county-by-county data are available at americandefault.org/methodology/cdi.

— 30 —

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Lewis and Clark County's CDI score, and what does it mean?

Lewis and Clark County scores 34 out of 100 on the County Distress Index, placing it in the Healthy zone. It ranks 2,514th of 3,144 U.S. counties and 30th of 56 Montana counties. A score of 50 is the national county median; higher = more distressed.

What drives Lewis and Clark County's distress score?

The primary driver is Housing Cost Burden, at a domain score of 56. Owner housing burden ranks at the 85th percentile nationally.

How does Lewis and Clark County compare to its neighbors?

Lewis and Clark County's neighbors span two CDI zones. Highest-distress neighbor: Cascade County (44.31, Normal). Lowest: Jefferson County (16.21, Healthy).

How is the County Distress Index calculated?

The CDI is a 0–100 composite of 21 indicators across five factors, derived via principal component analysis. Factor weights: Consumer Credit Distress 47.5%, Housing Cost Burden 22.3%, Structural Poverty 13.6%, Economic Vitality 9.2%, Legal Distress 7.4%. Data from Urban Institute, Census Bureau, BLS, U.S. Courts, and HUD. Full methodology →
Ross Kilburn
Written by

Ross Kilburn, Founder

Founder · American Default Research · Seattle, Washington

Two decades working directly with financially distressed American households — from property preservation in 2003, to negotiating over 1,000 short sales during the Great Recession, to foreclosure defense marketing today. Author, The Ark Law Group Complete Guide to Short Sales (Auroch Press, 2013). Founded American Default Research in 2026.

Read more
from Ross →