Labor Share of Nonfarm Business Output
BLS seasonally adjusted labor-share index, 2017=100
Where the Labor Share of Nonfarm Business Output stands now
The Labor Share of Nonfarm Business Output was 93.4 in the second quarter of 2026, the lowest in data back to 1947. It has been lower than the quarter before for five quarters in a row.
How the Labor Share of Nonfarm Business Output has moved since 1947
Labor Share of Nonfarm Business Output: down since 2021, the lowest in data back to 1947
Nonfarm business labor share for all workers, seasonally adjusted index (2017=100): 93.4 in the second quarter of 2026, down from 96.7 a year earlier. Quarterly, 1947–2026.
What the Labor Share of Nonfarm Business Output measures
Measurement basis: Seasonally adjusted BLS index of labor share for all workers in the nonfarm business sector, with 2017=100 (series PRS85006173). The level is an index, not a percentage of income or output.
A lower index value is worse for households.
Labor Share of Nonfarm Business Output by quarter, 1947 to 2026
| Quarter | Index value | Change from a year earlier |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 2026 | 93.4 | −3.3 |
| Q1 2026 | 94.8 | −3.1 |
| Q4 2025 | 95.7 | −1.2 |
| Q3 2025 | 96 | −0.7 |
| Q2 2025 | 96.7 | +0.1 |
| Q1 2025 | 97.9 | +1 |
| Q4 2024 | 96.9 | +0.7 |
| Q3 2024 | 96.7 | +0.4 |
| Q2 2024 | 96.6 | −0.1 |
| Q1 2024 | 96.9 | +0.3 |
| Q4 2023 | 96.2 | −0.7 |
| Q3 2023 | 96.3 | −1.9 |
| Q2 2023 | 96.7 | −0.8 |
| Q1 2023 | 96.6 | −2.5 |
| Q4 2022 | 96.9 | −2.7 |
| Q3 2022 | 98.2 | −2.5 |
| Q2 2022 | 97.5 | −2.9 |
| Q1 2022 | 99.1 | −1.5 |
| Q4 2021 | 99.6 | −3.2 |
| Q3 2021 | 100.7 | +0.7 |
| Q2 2021 | 100.4 | −3.8 |
| Q1 2021 | 100.6 | −1.6 |
| Q4 2020 | 102.8 | +3.2 |
| Q3 2020 | 100 | +1.1 |
| Q2 2020 | 104.2 | +4 |
| Q1 2020 | 102.2 | +0.9 |
| Q4 2019 | 99.6 | −0.5 |
| Q3 2019 | 98.9 | −1 |
| Q2 2019 | 100.2 | +0.6 |
| Q1 2019 | 101.3 | +1.5 |
| Q4 2018 | 100.1 | 0 |
| Q3 2018 | 99.9 | −0.2 |
| Q2 2018 | 99.6 | −0.5 |
| Q1 2018 | 99.8 | +0.1 |
| Q4 2017 | 100.1 | +0.8 |
| Q3 2017 | 100.1 | +0.8 |
| Q2 2017 | 100.1 | +0.6 |
| Q1 2017 | 99.7 | −0.2 |
| Q4 2016 | 99.3 | −0.9 |
| Q3 2016 | 99.3 | −0.4 |
| Q2 2016 | 99.5 | 0 |
| Q1 2016 | 99.9 | +0.2 |
| Q4 2015 | 100.2 | +1.2 |
| Q3 2015 | 99.7 | +2.1 |
| Q2 2015 | 99.5 | +1.2 |
| Q1 2015 | 99.7 | −0.3 |
| Q4 2014 | 99 | +1.4 |
| Q3 2014 | 97.6 | −0.7 |
| Q2 2014 | 98.3 | −1.4 |
| Q1 2014 | 100 | +1 |
| Q4 2013 | 97.6 | −3.6 |
| Q3 2013 | 98.3 | −0.3 |
| Q2 2013 | 99.7 | +0.9 |
| Q1 2013 | 99 | −0.3 |
| Q4 2012 | 101.2 | +3.4 |
| Q3 2012 | 98.6 | −1.5 |
| Q2 2012 | 98.8 | −0.9 |
| Q1 2012 | 99.3 | −2 |
| Q4 2011 | 97.8 | −1.3 |
| Q3 2011 | 100.1 | +0.5 |
| Q2 2011 | 99.7 | −0.1 |
| Q1 2011 | 101.3 | +1.9 |
| Q4 2010 | 99.1 | −1.9 |
| Q3 2010 | 99.6 | −2.4 |
| Q2 2010 | 99.8 | −3.2 |
| Q1 2010 | 99.4 | −2.6 |
| Q4 2009 | 101 | −5.1 |
| Q3 2009 | 102 | −2.2 |
| Q2 2009 | 103 | −1.3 |
| Q1 2009 | 102 | −3.8 |
| Q4 2008 | 106.1 | +1.8 |
| Q3 2008 | 104.2 | +0.1 |
| Q2 2008 | 104.3 | −0.7 |
| Q1 2008 | 105.8 | −0.3 |
| Q4 2007 | 104.3 | −0.5 |
| Q3 2007 | 104.1 | +0.2 |
| Q2 2007 | 105 | +1 |
| Q1 2007 | 106.1 | +1.5 |
| Q4 2006 | 104.8 | +0.8 |
| Q3 2006 | 103.9 | −0.4 |
| Q2 2006 | 104 | −0.7 |
| Q1 2006 | 104.6 | −0.1 |
| Q4 2005 | 104 | −2.1 |
| Q3 2005 | 104.3 | −2.9 |
| Q2 2005 | 104.7 | −1.7 |
| Q1 2005 | 104.7 | −1.3 |
| Q4 2004 | 106.1 | −0.8 |
| Q3 2004 | 107.2 | +0.5 |
| Q2 2004 | 106.4 | −1.4 |
| Q1 2004 | 106 | −1.6 |
| Q4 2003 | 106.9 | −1.6 |
| Q3 2003 | 106.7 | −1.8 |
| Q2 2003 | 107.8 | −1.2 |
| Q1 2003 | 107.6 | −1.1 |
| Q4 2002 | 108.5 | −2 |
| Q3 2002 | 108.5 | −2.6 |
| Q2 2002 | 109 | −2.7 |
| Q1 2002 | 108.7 | −4.9 |
| Q4 2001 | 110.5 | −0.7 |
| Q3 2001 | 111.1 | −0.9 |
| Q2 2001 | 111.7 | +1.2 |
| Q1 2001 | 113.6 | +0.8 |
| Q4 2000 | 111.2 | +1.9 |
| Q3 2000 | 112 | +2.8 |
| Q2 2000 | 110.5 | +0.9 |
| Q1 2000 | 112.8 | +2.9 |
| Q4 1999 | 109.3 | −0.2 |
| Q3 1999 | 109.2 | −0.5 |
| Q2 1999 | 109.6 | −0.1 |
| Q1 1999 | 109.9 | +0.9 |
| Q4 1998 | 109.5 | +1.6 |
| Q3 1998 | 109.7 | +2.9 |
| Q2 1998 | 109.7 | +2.8 |
| Q1 1998 | 109 | +1.1 |
| Q4 1997 | 107.9 | +0.8 |
| Q3 1997 | 106.8 | −0.3 |
| Q2 1997 | 106.9 | −0.1 |
| Q1 1997 | 107.9 | +0.4 |
| Q4 1996 | 107.1 | −0.3 |
| Q3 1996 | 107.1 | −0.2 |
| Q2 1996 | 107 | −0.1 |
| Q1 1996 | 107.5 | +0.3 |
| Q4 1995 | 107.4 | +0.3 |
| Q3 1995 | 107.3 | −0.6 |
| Q2 1995 | 107.1 | −0.9 |
| Q1 1995 | 107.2 | −0.5 |
| Q4 1994 | 107.1 | −1.9 |
| Q3 1994 | 107.9 | −1.3 |
| Q2 1994 | 108 | −2 |
| Q1 1994 | 107.7 | −1.4 |
| Q4 1993 | 109 | −0.8 |
| Q3 1993 | 109.2 | −1.5 |
| Q2 1993 | 110 | −0.9 |
| Q1 1993 | 109.1 | −2.2 |
| Q4 1992 | 109.8 | −1.1 |
| Q3 1992 | 110.7 | +0.4 |
| Q2 1992 | 110.9 | +0.3 |
| Q1 1992 | 111.3 | +0.4 |
| Q4 1991 | 110.9 | −0.7 |
| Q3 1991 | 110.3 | −0.3 |
| Q2 1991 | 110.6 | +0.1 |
| Q1 1991 | 110.9 | +0.7 |
| Q4 1990 | 111.6 | +1.5 |
| Q3 1990 | 110.6 | +1.4 |
| Q2 1990 | 110.5 | +1 |
| Q1 1990 | 110.2 | −0.5 |
| Q4 1989 | 110.1 | −0.9 |
| Q3 1989 | 109.2 | −2.5 |
| Q2 1989 | 109.5 | −2.5 |
| Q1 1989 | 110.7 | −1.2 |
| Q4 1988 | 111 | −0.1 |
| Q3 1988 | 111.7 | +0.4 |
| Q2 1988 | 112 | +1 |
| Q1 1988 | 111.9 | +0.3 |
| Q4 1987 | 111.1 | −0.1 |
| Q3 1987 | 111.3 | +1.3 |
| Q2 1987 | 111 | +1.8 |
| Q1 1987 | 111.6 | +2.7 |
| Q4 1986 | 111.2 | +2 |
| Q3 1986 | 110 | +2.2 |
| Q2 1986 | 109.2 | +0.8 |
| Q1 1986 | 108.9 | +0.5 |
| Q4 1985 | 109.2 | +0.7 |
| Q3 1985 | 107.8 | −0.6 |
| Q2 1985 | 108.4 | +0.2 |
| Q1 1985 | 108.4 | −0.2 |
| Q4 1984 | 108.5 | +0.4 |
| Q3 1984 | 108.4 | +0.4 |
| Q2 1984 | 108.2 | −1.3 |
| Q1 1984 | 108.6 | −2.8 |
| Q4 1983 | 108.1 | −4 |
| Q3 1983 | 108 | −4.7 |
| Q2 1983 | 109.5 | −3 |
| Q1 1983 | 111.4 | −1.7 |
| Q4 1982 | 112.1 | +1 |
| Q3 1982 | 112.7 | +2.6 |
| Q2 1982 | 112.5 | +1.5 |
| Q1 1982 | 113.1 | +3.2 |
| Q4 1981 | 111.1 | −1.1 |
| Q3 1981 | 110.1 | −2.7 |
| Q2 1981 | 111 | −1.2 |
| Q1 1981 | 109.9 | −1.3 |
| Q4 1980 | 112.2 | +0.7 |
| Q3 1980 | 112.8 | +2.1 |
| Q2 1980 | 112.2 | +1.8 |
| Q1 1980 | 111.2 | +0.4 |
| Q4 1979 | 111.5 | +2.7 |
| Q3 1979 | 110.7 | +1.8 |
| Q2 1979 | 110.4 | +1.4 |
| Q1 1979 | 110.8 | −0.5 |
| Q4 1978 | 108.8 | −0.9 |
| Q3 1978 | 108.9 | +0.6 |
| Q2 1978 | 109 | +0.2 |
| Q1 1978 | 111.3 | +2.5 |
| Q4 1977 | 109.7 | +0.7 |
| Q3 1977 | 108.3 | −0.7 |
| Q2 1977 | 108.8 | +0.3 |
| Q1 1977 | 108.8 | +0.2 |
| Q4 1976 | 109 | −0.4 |
| Q3 1976 | 109 | −0.3 |
| Q2 1976 | 108.5 | −1.9 |
| Q1 1976 | 108.6 | −2.9 |
| Q4 1975 | 109.4 | −3.2 |
| Q3 1975 | 109.3 | −4.6 |
| Q2 1975 | 110.4 | −2.5 |
| Q1 1975 | 111.5 | −2.2 |
| Q4 1974 | 112.6 | −0.9 |
| Q3 1974 | 113.9 | +0.8 |
| Q2 1974 | 112.9 | +1.3 |
| Q1 1974 | 113.7 | +2.4 |
| Q4 1973 | 113.5 | +2 |
| Q3 1973 | 113.1 | +2 |
| Q2 1973 | 111.6 | +0.7 |
| Q1 1973 | 111.3 | −0.9 |
| Q4 1972 | 111.5 | −0.8 |
| Q3 1972 | 111.1 | +0.2 |
| Q2 1972 | 110.9 | −0.6 |
| Q1 1972 | 112.2 | +0.7 |
| Q4 1971 | 112.3 | −1.4 |
| Q3 1971 | 110.9 | −2.3 |
| Q2 1971 | 111.5 | −2.2 |
| Q1 1971 | 111.5 | −3.7 |
| Q4 1970 | 113.7 | −1.1 |
| Q3 1970 | 113.2 | 0 |
| Q2 1970 | 113.7 | +1.3 |
| Q1 1970 | 115.2 | +4.2 |
| Q4 1969 | 114.8 | +3.2 |
| Q3 1969 | 113.2 | +2.5 |
| Q2 1969 | 112.4 | +2.7 |
| Q1 1969 | 111 | +0.9 |
| Q4 1968 | 111.6 | +0.8 |
| Q3 1968 | 110.7 | 0 |
| Q2 1968 | 109.7 | −1 |
| Q1 1968 | 110.1 | +0.2 |
| Q4 1967 | 110.8 | +0.9 |
| Q3 1967 | 110.7 | +0.4 |
| Q2 1967 | 110.7 | +0.7 |
| Q1 1967 | 109.9 | +1.3 |
| Q4 1966 | 109.9 | +1.4 |
| Q3 1966 | 110.3 | +1.1 |
| Q2 1966 | 110 | −0.7 |
| Q1 1966 | 108.6 | −2 |
| Q4 1965 | 108.5 | −3.6 |
| Q3 1965 | 109.2 | −1.4 |
| Q2 1965 | 110.7 | −0.1 |
| Q1 1965 | 110.6 | +0.1 |
| Q4 1964 | 112.1 | +0.3 |
| Q3 1964 | 110.6 | −0.6 |
| Q2 1964 | 110.8 | −1.9 |
| Q1 1964 | 110.5 | −2.6 |
| Q4 1963 | 111.8 | −1.1 |
| Q3 1963 | 111.2 | −1.4 |
| Q2 1963 | 112.7 | −1.1 |
| Q1 1963 | 113.1 | +0.1 |
| Q4 1962 | 112.9 | −0.7 |
| Q3 1962 | 112.6 | −1.2 |
| Q2 1962 | 113.8 | −1.1 |
| Q1 1962 | 113 | −3.5 |
| Q4 1961 | 113.6 | −3.5 |
| Q3 1961 | 113.8 | −1.7 |
| Q2 1961 | 114.9 | −1 |
| Q1 1961 | 116.5 | +2.9 |
| Q4 1960 | 117.1 | +3.1 |
| Q3 1960 | 115.5 | +2.4 |
| Q2 1960 | 115.9 | +2.9 |
| Q1 1960 | 113.6 | +0.2 |
| Q4 1959 | 114 | +1 |
| Q3 1959 | 113.1 | −1.8 |
| Q2 1959 | 113 | −2 |
| Q1 1959 | 113.4 | −3 |
| Q4 1958 | 113 | −2.2 |
| Q3 1958 | 114.9 | +0.6 |
| Q2 1958 | 115 | 0 |
| Q1 1958 | 116.4 | +2.3 |
| Q4 1957 | 115.2 | +0.1 |
| Q3 1957 | 114.3 | −0.8 |
| Q2 1957 | 115 | +0.2 |
| Q1 1957 | 114.1 | +0.3 |
| Q4 1956 | 115.1 | +3.3 |
| Q3 1956 | 115.1 | +3.6 |
| Q2 1956 | 114.8 | +3.8 |
| Q1 1956 | 113.8 | +3 |
| Q4 1955 | 111.8 | −0.9 |
| Q3 1955 | 111.5 | −1.9 |
| Q2 1955 | 111 | −3.4 |
| Q1 1955 | 110.8 | −4.4 |
| Q4 1954 | 112.7 | −2.2 |
| Q3 1954 | 113.4 | −0.1 |
| Q2 1954 | 114.4 | +1.2 |
| Q1 1954 | 115.2 | +2.3 |
| Q4 1953 | 114.9 | +2.2 |
| Q3 1953 | 113.5 | +0.5 |
| Q2 1953 | 113.2 | +0.9 |
| Q1 1953 | 112.9 | +1.5 |
| Q4 1952 | 112.7 | +1.8 |
| Q3 1952 | 113 | +3.2 |
| Q2 1952 | 112.3 | +0.5 |
| Q1 1952 | 111.4 | +0.9 |
| Q4 1951 | 110.9 | −0.1 |
| Q3 1951 | 109.8 | −0.9 |
Quarterly · U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data retrieved via FRED (PRS85006173)
Counties with the highest labor scores
There's no county figure for this measure, so this list uses the labor part of our County Distress Index.
| Rank | County | Score (0–100) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Apache County, AZ | 99.2 |
| 2 | Mingo County, WV | 98.7 |
| 3 | Navajo County, AZ | 97.3 |
| 4 | Luna County, NM | 97.2 |
| 5 | McKinley County, NM | 96.8 |
| 6 | Lake County, CA | 96.8 |
| 7 | Clare County, MI | 96.6 |
| 8 | Harlan County, KY | 96.2 |
| 9 | Wyoming County, WV | 96.2 |
| 10 | Pike County, KY | 96.1 |
Questions about the Labor Share of Nonfarm Business Output
What is the labor share?
It is the share of the nonfarm business sector's output that goes to workers as compensation, including wages, benefits and employer taxes. BLS reports it here as an index with 2017 = 100; the the second quarter of 2026 reading was 93.4.
How has the labor share changed?
The index was 93.4 in the second quarter of 2026, down from 94.8 in the first quarter of 2026. It is the lowest reading in current BLS estimates for the nonfarm business sector, which begin in 1947; recent quarters are still subject to revision.
Does a lower labor share mean workers are paid less?
Not necessarily. The share compares compensation with output. Pay can rise while the share falls, if output grows more. The share is also one total for the whole sector, so it says nothing about how pay is split among workers.
Is this labor's share of GDP?
No. The base is output of the nonfarm business sector, which leaves out government, nonprofits, households and farms. Other labor-share measures, such as the nonfinancial corporate share or the Penn World Table share of GDP, are different series with different numbers.
Sources and method for the Labor Share of Nonfarm Business Output
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data retrieved via FRED (PRS85006173) Measurement basis: Seasonally adjusted BLS index of labor share for all workers in the nonfarm business sector, with 2017=100 (series PRS85006173). The level is an index, not a percentage of income or output. We use the quarterly figures as published, from the first quarter of 1947 through the second quarter of 2026, with no adjustment of our own. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’s report
We write with assistance from AI tools. Figures come from the data and sources named on this page.